My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-2023 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
08-28-2023 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2023 2:48:35 PM
Creation date
9/12/2023 2:48:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> August 28,2023 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Benson asked if this was planned as part of the building,why was this coming to the Council now. <br /> Edwards said it is not part of the bonding but would be paid for by the water enterprise fund. <br /> Benson asked if the impact on vendors drawing water when they are near a hydrant but now would have <br /> to come up to public works with perhaps more trips necessary had been looked at. <br /> Edwards said in most cases it would not have a significant impact,but it would affect vendors coming <br /> from the Navarre area. The typical use is by landscapers, and they may come daily but they draw a large <br /> amount of water at a time. The amount of traffic would only be about five vehicles on a busy day. He said <br /> it would also control hours of operations. <br /> Johnson moved, Crosby seconded,to approve the Bulk Water Filling Station.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays <br /> 0. <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br /> 15. RICK SCHIDEMAN,4075 HIGHWOOD ROAD, ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT <br /> Community Development Director Laura Oakden said the request involved an existing boathouse.At the <br /> March 13,2023,meeting the property owner requested an encroachment agreement for a boathouse that <br /> crosses over the property line.A portion of the existing structure is located in an unimproved right-of- <br /> way. The owner hopes to obtain building permits for maintenance of the building like new siding and <br /> roofing, but because the building is not located fully within his property,the City cannot issue building <br /> permits for maintenance.At the March 13 Council meeting, Councilmember Johnson asked for clarity <br /> regarding the landscaping and accessibility of the site,she said. City staff met with the applicant in May <br /> to review the landscaping and improvements on the site. It appears that new arborvitae have been planted <br /> within the right-of-way. Public Works confirmed that they still have reasonable access to the City <br /> infrastructure around the landscaping. This lake access has not been identified for public access for <br /> recreation.Park Department Staff was also present at the meeting and noted that there is an existing lake <br /> access further along Highwood Road. The abutting neighbor on the other side of the lake access was <br /> granted permission to install a driveway in this right of way. Granting the encroachment agreement will <br /> allow the proper permits to be issued for maintenance of the existing structure. The City Engineer has <br /> reviewed the request and noted the current right-of-way is being used for utilities and has storm sewer and <br /> sanitary sewer infrastructure throughout. The current building does not appear to be in conflict with the <br /> existing utility infrastructure. Oakden said she had identified a list of conditions for the property owner <br /> and with those conditions,the staff recommends approval. <br /> The applicant,Rick Schideman,said the only landscaping that had been done was to replace existing <br /> landscaping that was there when they moved in. <br /> Johnson said this is a two-parter with one side being an encroachment agreement.He said he is supportive <br /> of making improvements as the applicants didn't put the building there,but it is an improvement on City- <br /> owned property.He said he had received complaints that the property owners on both sides had added <br /> landscaping on City-owned property. He suggested the City put corner markers on their easements so <br /> abutting property owners understand the location of City easements that people are using as access. There <br /> have been other instances where the City had to make people remove improvements on City property,he <br /> said. He said he supports working with this applicant to get their maintenance plans approved,but also <br /> Page 5 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.