Laserfiche WebLink
■i* r^l <br />Dean Maeser <br />June 5, 1995 <br />Page 4 <br />In doing a lot line rearrangement, you would be asking the City to treat each of your lott <br />sepa^ly as individual parcels. If the City was convinced that ^u could con^ct a <br />reLence on each parcel as it exists today. whUe meeting aU standards except for lot area <br />and width, then the City might have a basis to consider <br />more useful lots. However, because the zoning dismct , towise <br />setbacks, no house could be constructed on Lot 10, which « 50 wi^. Likewis , <br />a house only 11.6- wide could be constructed while meetmg the side sabacte on L <br />and no houre could be constructed on Lot 12 because that entire lot is less tto 75 from <br />th^ lake Therefore, given that none of the three lots is individually buildable u^r to <br />^n!^ codTrequireinents even when lot area and lot width <br />City would be unlikely to recognize your nghts to more than a single bu Idmg s . <br />faS! by definition a lot line reanangeraent is only allowed when the sailimg lots meet <br />all zoning standards, which is impossible in your case. <br />It is my opinion that none of to scenarios described above are likely to result ” to «liof <br />desire With that in mind, I would not encourage you to make an applicatton for any of^^» <br />scenarios Hoover, if you feei compelled to formally pursue one of these routes, ton I believe <br />Council will be persuaded to ignore the lot area issues. <br />T » frs a cite nlanner vou might want to procure the services of an attorney who <br />spe^Siis in land usc^to help you understand the intricacies of land use laws and ordinances. <br />I hope this information is of help to you, and I apologize for it taking <br />of to two to three weeks promised. Please feel free to contact me at 473-7357 tf I can be of <br />further assistance. <br />Sincerely, <br />Michael P. Gaffron <br />Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />MPG/Isv <br />Enc. Tax Information 1974-1995