My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:51:34 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:43:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
411
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
sI <br />TO:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />3. <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:January 8, 19% <br />SUBJECT: #20% Kevin and Diane Holmes/Orchard Park Farm Inc. - 555 and 585 <br />Stubbs Bav Road North - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement <br />Zoning District: RR-IA <br />Total area of property = 39.07 acres <br />Application: Applicants propose a lot line rearrangement of the properties located at 555/585 <br />Smbbs Bay Road that would result in the existing 1.5 acre lot located at 585 being upgraded <br />to a conforming lot within the 5 acre zoning district. <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />Section 10.27, Subd. 5(B) - RR-IA lot standards. <br />Required = 5 acres <br />Proposed Parcel A = 33.87 acres <br />Proposed Parcel B + C = 5.2 acres <br />Section 10.03, Subd. 9(C 2&3) - Oversized accessory structure area standards/setback <br />requirements. <br />A. Allowed area for oversized accessory structure (5+ acre parcel) <br />Allowed = 2,200 s.f. <br />Bam = 1.125 s.f. <br />Shed = 990 s.f. <br />B. Setback <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />50' side <br />75'+ <br />100' rear <br />300'+ <br />Secuon 11.10, Subd. 10 and Section 703, Definition 66, Class 1 Subdivision - Subdivision is <br />required because of the need to dedicate right-ol-way of road as both lots meet the ^ <br />zoning standards and would normally not have been required to follow through with the <br />subdivision application. <br />«
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.