Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2104 <br />January 9, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Decks - <br />Driveway/sidewalk/tumaround <br />House/garage - <br />Total <br />322 s.f. <br />2.742 s.f. <br />3.380 s.f. <br />6,444 s.f. (26.2%) <br />Minor adjustments to decks and driveway will be necessar>- to reduce by 300 s.f. to the 25% <br />level. <br />Items for Discussion <br />1. Does Planning Commission have any concepmal or specific problems with the requested <br />lot area and width variances (which are inherent in this sewered property) or the average <br />setback encroachment? <br />2. Does Planning Commission wish to review the grading and drainage plans once they <br />are received? Is it necessary or appropriate to table the application until the drainage <br />plans are submitted, or is Planning Commission comfortable with a recommendation of <br />conceptual approval subject to those plans being submitted and accepted by staff prior <br />to review of this application by the Citj' Council? <br />3. Does Planning Commission have any other issues regarding this proposal? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />If Planning Commission feels that the requested lot area, lot width arid average setback <br />variances are justified and supported by adequate hardship, and if Planning Commission is <br />comfortable conceptually with the hardcover plan subject to minor adjustments to meet Ae 25% <br />limit, then a recommendation for approval would be appropriate, subject to staff review and <br />approval of the final hardcover proposal and site grading plans, prior to final Council action. <br />Options for Action <br />1 Approve as proposed, subject to staff review and approval of grading/drainage plan prior <br />to final Council action. <br />2. Table pending receipt of grading/drainage plan. <br />3. Denial (specify reasons). <br />4.Other.