Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning FUe #2102 <br />January 10, 1996 <br />Page 4 <br />Additional Information Needed to Complete Review <br />1. Method to be used to excavate spoils. <br />2.How shall spoil material be stored during the winter months until the spring? Spoils cannot <br />be allowed to thaw and drain back into designated wetland area. <br />3.Review construction schedule set forth by applicant. Exhibit C. Do members feel <br />construction schedule is realistic/feasible? <br />Note sub-section G (Section 10.56, Subd. 16) "plans to place fill or excavated material on <br />steep slopes must be reviewed by the City Engineer to insure continued slope stability and <br />must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater". Gustafson has been asked to review the <br />filling phase of the permit and to approve slope of bank. Staff will have his written <br />comments at your meeting. An 8' rise in 65' to 70' appears to meet the slope limits. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />What is unique or different about the alteration of this 30+ acre wetland? <br />Will the environmental benefits outweigh the negatives? <br />Consider the intent of the applicants. Have applicants convinced you of the merits of the <br />application? <br />4. Has the information submitted with application supported representations of applicants? <br />Options of Action <br />To deny, approve or approve as amended. Any condition of approval must include the following: <br />1.Prior to scheduling the application before the Council, applicant's surveyor to <br />provide an amended survey designating the following: <br />a. Open water area or pond per amended construction plan by D. Nadeau, <br />b. Proposed contour for restored banks. <br />c. Locate Type 3 wetlands to west of 958 contour. <br />d. Develop metes and bounds description for designed wetland. <br />i <br />I