01-16-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2097 January 8, 1996 Page 3 The ^jplication also involves a request to rebuild an attached deck located to the lake and west sides of the residence. It exists at 540 s.f. and will be reduced to an area of 367.9 s.f. The deck will encroach no closer into the 0-75' setback nor will it extend any closer to the rear setback line or extend any fiirther beyond the average lakeshore setback line than the existing deck. Lot coverage exists now at 16.1% and would be reduced to 14.6%. The existing deck appears to have no impact upon the views of the adjacent residences. The applicant also proposes a reduction of some 130 s.f. of hardcover within the 75-250* setback area existing at 26.28% and proposed at 22.2%. Statement of Hardships Refer to Exhibit D, applicant's addendum notes the following hardships: 1.Applicant notes the age and deteriorating condition of structures specifically garage foundation and cement floor and were found to need complete replacement rather than a "patch up". 2.The garage and storage above are the only storage areas on the property that contains a small residence with two small closets and no basement area. 3.Deck is deteriorating and unsafe. The deck has been designed so that access can be provided at four doors that open out onto deck. The redesign results in a reduction of 172.1 s.f. of deck area. 4.There is a need to retain as much off-street parking on this property as there is no parking on Crystal Bay Road. 5.3,500 s.f. of a City road encroaches the property via a prescriptive easernent. T^e majority of the lot is located within the 0-75' setback area (7,830 s.f. in 0- 75', 3,200 in the 75-250'). Issues for Consideration 1. Should other hardcover removals be required? 2.Structural coverage is proposed at 14.6%. Should deck be further reduced? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. 1