My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:51:34 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:43:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
411
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO.o <•-> o <br />K <br />*■ s -S <br />findings: <br />A At iust over 16.000 s.f. in area, the combined lots contains substantial <br />area for construction of single family residence without the requirement <br />for any other variances to the zoning chapter. <br />B. Municipal sewer is available and assessed to the property. <br />C Developed lot sizes in the neighborhood range from 0.14 acre to 1.5 acres <br />ofTry land, averaging about 0.55 acres. The combinatjon of Uu 8 <br />9 at 0.37 acre yields a lot size that is not inconsistent with other lots m the <br />neighborhood. <br />Their is no other land available for purchase in order to make the lot size <br />conforming. <br />5 The Citv Council has considered this application including the fmdings ^d <br />SotSrenSions of the Planntng Commission, reports by C ty s.ff. co— <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />6 The Citv Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />to it and do not apply generally to other propeny m this zoning nistrict tot <br />.ranting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would mere <br />se“e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary “ “ " <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve “prop <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />D. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.