Laserfiche WebLink
^OM^TES OFTHE O^ONO <br />% ^ScE - PUBLIC HEARING 9:13 P.M. - 9:35 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Steve Englund were present. <br />Gaffron explained this was a relatives own neighboring <br />0.37 acre. The Zoning Code re^«s .^c.e. ^ oieets that standard. Some <br />parcels, no additional land is available. . mstaUed in consultation with <br />Linage improvements have been property. There are mamre trees <br />tile Public Works Department on^e neighb^^^^^^ ^ <br />on the property and it is not a desi^(^cov*r is allowed. The conceptual proposal would not <br />250-500- hardcover zone where » “^LeVLuid be proposed. The property has been <br />be a problem on this lot. i o ^ would not be necessary <br />assesL for sewer and a well t and this lot is not <br />to vacate. 15% lot coverage is allowed. Lot siz ary <br />inconsistent with the area. <br />mt'suilttrlwdfbl^ <br />Smitii asked how much fill would be required because of the steep bank from the sueet to the <br />proposed home site. <br />Hngiund suted he ho^d to r^y <br />b “nec«sS^^ ” n1" red that fiU required would be approximately 5-6'm height. <br />A neighbor questioned what w^ir^nr^dhig on the back of the lot. <br />E“s 2 “ s -i. - - <br />installation. <br />Gaffron explained there would <br />but likely none under the house. ^ all fill U brought in at the tune of house <br />« in", prf the building permit. <br />Vi» ;n rniild affect the drainage. Gaffron responded that a <br />^L'tSi wLd t retw any fiU was brought onto the property.