My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:51:34 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:43:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
411
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />Water table is defined as "the highest elevation in the soU where aU voids are fiUed <br />with water, as evidenced by presence of water or soil mottling or other <br />infonnation". <br />In the State of Minnesota, soil mottling has become the key factor m detenmmng <br />the highest level of seasonal saturation in the soil. In Orono's loam and clay loam <br />soils soil mottling and seasonal samration are commonly found from 2 ’ to 5' below <br />the ground surface. In order to meet the 3 ’ separation requirement, a majority of <br />new septic systems are mounds, which maintain the 3 separation. <br />The use of soil mottling ior determining seasonal samration is subjective at best, <br />but is the onlv practical method identified by the State for determining seasonal <br />samration. However, in some years samration may not occur at the mottlmg level, <br />and in other years saturation may occur at the mottling level for only a few days, <br />weeks or months in a given year. The State has taken the position that even though <br />the system might be too close to the water table for a short period dunng any given <br />year, that system is not conforming. <br />Verv few septic systems in Orono are failing at any given time, perhaps 3-5% or <br />1 in'25. However, as many as 500-600 of the 1150 existing systems are estimated <br />as fitting the definition of "non-conforming". While these may treat sewage quite <br />adequately most of the time, during some periods they may not. <br />3. Evaluation Methods. <br />Each neighborhood was evaluated in terms of soil and water conditions, proximity <br />to lakeshore or other water bodies, and lot sizes. Within each neighborhoot^ <br />individual svstems were analyzed to determine system type (trench, mound, bed <br />or cesspool), system condition (working, marginal or failing), conformity with 3 <br />separation requirement (conforming or aonconforming). whether the system is m <br />the designated "Shoreland" district, and whether or not an alternate drainfield site <br />is available. <br />Note that in analyzing system conditions, systems exhibiting no surface discharge <br />and generally in working order were considered as "working"; systems obviously <br />discharging to the surface were considered as "failing"; and systems^with a <br />drainfield area saturated but not discharging were considered as "marginal". It is, <br />therefore, possible and quite common to have a system that is working but is still <br />non-conforming. <br />4 Table 2 - Summary of Systems by Neighborhood (Page 8) <br />5. Individual System Data and Neighborhood Maps (Pages 9-33) <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.