My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
01-16-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:51:34 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:43:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
411
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 6 - MUSA Boundary Revision <br />January 8, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />Note that if the City is successful in its application to the Metropolitan Council, the City <br />Council will consider in more detail which areas of the City will be immediately scheduled for <br />municipal sewer installation. Not all ten areas are proposed to be sewered immediately, and <br />it may be five to ten years or more before all have been served. A few of the areas have <br />requested sewer as soon as possible. <br />Related/Non-Related Issues <br />The Metropolitan Council considers a number of related and non-related issues when reviewing <br />cities’ requests for MUSA boundary amendments. These include; <br />Viability of the City’s on-site systems management plan. <br />Sewer in-flow/infiltration management plan. <br />Status of local stormwater planning. <br />Land use policies including rural density. <br />Transportation. <br />Housing, especially in the areas of affordable and life cycle housing. <br />In its application to the Metropolitan Council, the City has addressed each of these issues in <br />a manner that we hope will gain acceptance from Metropolitan Council. Some of these issues <br />may require additional actions by the City in the form of specific ordinance adoption and/or <br />additional comprehensive plan amendments. It is the City's expectation that Metropolitan <br />Council will review the proposal within a 60-day timeframe and by mid-March the City should <br />have a good handle on what, if any, additional requirements or conditions will be placed on <br />approval of this amendment. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed MUSA boundary revisions as presented. <br />Options for Action <br />1 Recommend approval as presented. <br />2. Approve with conditions or revisions. <br />3. Table for further information <br />4. Recommend denial. <br />5.Other.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.