Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #2106 <br />February 10, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />garage and an upper story that contained living areas. The structure did not contain a kitchen or a <br />bath and could not function as an independent unit. Prior to *he reconstruction that included a bath <br />and kitchen, applicant was required to file the conditional use permit for a guest house use. The <br />review did not consider setback variances as all work was done within the existing building envelope <br />and no structural improvements were proposed along the west side lot line. <br />Unfortunately, the applicant was advised that before he could rebuild the west wall of the structure <br />located 3.1' from the west side lot line that he would have to obtain a side setback variance. This <br />has created major delays for applicant who wishes to proceed as quick as possible with the <br />restoration. Review Exhibit J, applicant has asked to be placed on the next agenda of the Council. <br />Review Exhibits D and G, as applicant advises there is no plan to expand on the building envelope <br />but merely to replace the wall at the west side lot line and to replace interior walls damaged by <br />smoke. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Review Exhibit E, hardships are as follows: <br />1.Major landscaping improvements were completed at the time of the renovation of the <br />structure to relocate structure to the east would result in the loss of plantings and <br />retaining walls. <br />The movement of the structure to the east will result in the loss of mature trees and <br />plantings. <br />3. The structure has existed in its current location for over thirty-five years. <br />4. Steep slopes to the east and south present additional limitations for new construction <br />that would meet 10' side setback. <br />5. The foundation is in excellent shape and was not damaged by the fire, <br />Options of Action <br />To either approve or deny the application as proposed. <br />4