Laserfiche WebLink
Mn«IUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />meeting held on APRIL 1, 1996 DRAFT <br />McDomottaiidllse asked ifGarden Lane could be used as a tnul. McMillan noted that if <br />to smaccomplisl«d,tl« City would have to maintain it. McDennott said it would ju« <br />be an easement and could be left as it is adding that Garden Lane might not be changed. <br />White noted a lot with the driveway over the drainage easement. He also commented that <br />three of the lots were adjacem to the easement leaving only two that would not have <br />access to the drainage easement. <br />Use commented that she would wish the developer would see the reason for making a traU <br />if to road was private. If to tod was public. Ilse said this then could be used to grin <br />access to the trail. <br />Difierent viewpoints came from members on how residems respond to other people <br />coming omo a private road, both rilowing it and forbidding it. <br />Johnson said he was unsure how he felt about such a trail If an access was done. Johnson <br />feh it would be used by people from other areas and result in cars being parked on <br />Wildhurst. Suggestions of no parking signs were given. <br />Flint questioned what the topography was of to bank property to the east of Garden <br />. stefanson said this ponion was flat, but then dropped off. Gerhardson satd themLane <br />was a 20- drop in grade from to Johnson property to the bank property. <br />Flint said he would be troubled by not taking 8% of to property. He noted to area as <br />environmentally sensicve and close to to area to City is looking at for a park. White <br />responded that it was unknown whether to bank would be obtaining to land. It was <br />J <br />9