My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-I <br />sS- I <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Jeanne Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />April 10. 1996 <br />Tested Drainfield Locations. Lot 2, West Branch Hill <br />I have reviewed subdivision file #556, which resulted in the creation of Lot 2, West Branch Hill in <br />1982-83. While an experimental shallow trench system was initially proposed for Lot 2, that plan <br />was later dropped. Additional testing was then presented indicating a site suitable for shallow <br />trenches at the south central portion of Lot 2. with an alternate site requiring a mound system at the <br />southwest comer of the property (See Bob Koch drawing, 1982). <br />This alternate site was only tested via one perc test and one boring, inadequate to meet current <br />standards. Further, the City has since adopted a 6% slope limitation for mounds, and no slope <br />information was presented. Finally, it appears this site may conflict with the 25' easement along the <br />west side of Lot 2. <br />Note also that staff has not confirmed whether the shallow trench system for Lot 2 is actually <br />feasible, since mottling interpretation has been tightened up considerably in the 14 years since this <br />testing was done. Given the soil type, it is possible that actual mottling is much shallower than the <br />4.2-4.6' reported by Koch in 1982. <br />For the above reasons, before any approval is considered for use of the 25* easement for access <br />to Lots 95-96, additional testing should be done on Lot 2, West Branch Hill, to confirm that <br />feasible primary and alternate drainfield sites are available that won't be impacted by use of <br />the easement <br />iI
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.