My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
« • » <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 18, 19% <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />(Schroeder left the meeting at this time.) <br />(#10) #2119 BARNETT DIVISION CORPORATION AND HILLOWAY <br />CORPORATION , 180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WEST < SUBDIVISION/SKETCH <br />PLAN <br />Mark Gronberg was present along with Lori Lundeen, representing Barnett Division <br />Corporation, and Jim Pfennig, representing Hilloway Corporation. <br />Mahusth reported that the sketch plan review involves a 17 acre pared. The City granted <br />pretiminary approval of 2 lot division in 1988. At that time, one residential area was <br />created with a 13 acre outlot set aside for future development. The subdivision was never <br />finalized. The preliminary resolution provide guidelines for the future development of the <br />13 plus acre outlot. <br />The current proposal is for a 6 lot subdivision with a cul-de>sac located in the northeast <br />comer serving lots 1,3, and 4. Lots 2 and 5 would each have a separate curb cut at CoRd <br />19. Lot 6 was to continue to be served fi-om the existing driveway. Mabusth said the <br />access for the lots was reviewed with Gustafson. It was determined that the existing <br />access for lot 6 was considered unsafe and suggested a shared driveway with lot 5. City <br />guidelines had stipulated that an internal road should serve the majority of the lots. <br />Mabusth said she would like to see a redesign of the accesses with lots I, 2, 3, and 4 <br />served by an internal road. <br />Mabusth continued that the proposal also involves wetland issues. There are designated <br />wetlands on the property along with a wetland designated on the National Inventory Map <br />in the northwest comer, which would be deducted from the total acreage. Mabusth said <br />Staff would ask for wetland delineation. Type 1 and 2 wetlands are not deducted fi^om the <br />acreage. <br />Another issue concerns a recently completed lot line rearrangement with the Gefffe <br />property to the east. The imemal road should connect to western boundary of outlot C of <br />Bayview Farms providing access for future development. <br />Mabusth reported that septic testing was completed in 1988 for the existing residence. <br />The alternate site tested did not meet the 75' setback from designated wetland. The On- <br />Site Septic Manager confirms signs of serious leaching from the existing septic. Staff will <br />require septic testing for a new principal drainfield site which must meet the 75' wetland <br />separation. This may present a problem due to the additional right of way being dedicated <br />for CoRd 19. <br />13 <br />»j <br />■ ranr-aivmii iir--v-w-n ■irAlaA . 1 -a-'i-i'•-?»•»<-----■---------------rmitiw-------a m—tf-run*•—ni*«-i-i-i r.Tffeki .• -la wi ■.« n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.