My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2098 <br />HAROSHIP/DESCRIPTIQN OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS <br />Subiect property is encumbered by several hardships: <br />very small (8550 SF) ; dimensionally narrow and deep; the <br />grade drops steeply from street-level; the condition of the <br />obsolete existing dwelling is beyond reasonable repair; the <br />property lacks adequate off-street parking while being <br />located on a narrow roadway lined with narrow lots resulting <br />in exceptionally poor on-street parking capacity. <br />Originally constructed as a "lake cottage' with no garage, <br />the tiny existing house is now over 73 years old. Its <br />utility is adversely affected by deferred maintenance, areas <br />of decay and structural failure, and functional <br />obsolescence. Some unsafe conditions are <br />This building isn't a candidate for rehabilitation or <br />expansion and should be replaced. <br />hardship of the lot's small size and steep terrain while <br />allowing for a modest-sized modern residence, garage, and <br />^^^veway for added minimum off-street parking. <br />hardcover with shorter driveway than is the with 30 <br />setback; and (3), helps to overcome the hardship of the <br />steep grade, while still accommodating off-street parking <br />for four vehicles (two garaged and two in drive). <br />The minor side-setback and the 5 (25 vs. 30 ^ <br />setback variances seem more than offset by the fact that the <br />proposed new structure is 15 farther back from the lakeshore <br />than the existing house ..(which is at the 75' minimum) . The <br />proposal maintains ample sideyard separations from <br />neighboring buildings. <br />With relatively modest "footprint", the overall proposed <br />improvements represent a reasonable solution for <br />substantially overcoming the hardships. These improvements <br />would also enhance the neighborhood by (1) replacing the <br />worn, outmoded building in a way that offers an attractive <br />new home which meets the modern needs for year-round <br />permanent residency without disproportional "over-building <br />or adverse impact on adjoining properties; and (2), by <br />providing adequate off-street parking for four vehicles (two <br />garaged, two in 25' driveway). <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.