My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L_: <br />MTNTiTES OF THE O^^ONO PLAl^TsIN'G COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOV*EMBER 20. 1995 <br />(m - #2085 Depannieai ofKaiurai Resources - Coniinued) <br />Ga»on inquiitd about the consouction schedule. LumeU said it w^d next gi^to the <br />Council inDecember. If no maior channes were necessary, the final ola« »<>“><» ^ <br />^ed in Januaiy and Febniary with bidding for early spnng. Constnicnon would begin <br />in Mav and comolcted durina the summer. <br />No formal actiou was required at this meeting. <br />Wigen asked if a motion could be made on signage regarding trespassing. He was told <br />these concerns would be addressed by Staflf. <br />Lindquist asked that the comments be passed on to the CounciL Peterson closed the <br />public information meeting. <br />(#5) #2088 WINFIELD STEPHENS, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />VARIANCESA^ACATION OF PL^LIC ROAD - 9:06-9:35 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and AfiBdavit of Publication were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application was for the vacation of a 30' alley and »«back <br />variances for maior additions to existing reside.ice. The prooeity is made uo of 4 seo^ate <br />parcels and involves an improvement plan. Existing on the property is a 1-1/2 O'Y <br />with a garage that is located totally within the 3ff aUey. The improvOTent consists of wo <br />options! option #1 involves an addition to the south side and option #2 an addition to the <br />eL The Staff memo was said to discuss the setbacks and hardcover for the prooertv. <br />Peterson said there would appear to be no major concern as tong as the applicant was able <br />to acquire the alley. <br />Mabusth advised from caUs she received, it appeared that the adjacent owners may make <br />claim to the alley. Mabusth said she had spoken vvith Dennis HiU at the County who said <br />the entire alley would probably be granted to the applicant as owner of lots 2 and 3. <br />Mabusth said she had spoken with HiU again after calls had been receiv^ from the <br />neighbors, and he advised that the matter may have to be funher smdied. ftll <br />Mabusth if the neighbors pressed for a piece of the alley, these claims may be raised durm. <br />a required legal proceeding. <br />Peterson asked if the appUcation was not one step ahead of itself He asked it Staff was <br />awaiting information on utilities. The City Engineer reported there were no sewer Imes <br />encroaching the alley, and there are no power poles. <br />4 <br />.1^ i ■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.