My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2023 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
9/7/2023 2:42:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2088 <br />April 11,1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Review of Amended Proposal <br />As recommended by Planning Commission during the November review (Exlubit A) the applicant <br />has placed the addition to the south side of the existing residence so as lo minimize any visual impact <br />upon the Wicklund residence to the immediate north. At the request of the Landmaric Drive <br />neighbors. Exhibit F, the sitructure is now placed 15’ from the newly detoed west lot line. Residents <br />of Landmark agreed to not pursue any claim to vacated alley if applicant agreed to meet the 15’ <br />minimum setback. <br />The structure measures approximately 71' in an east/west direction. And at the west side the <br />structure averages 26' in depth and at the east 58' which includes a 21.8x8 covered deck at the <br />southeast comer of residence. Applicant's surv'eyor. Exhibit K, has not located deck at southeast <br />comer that will be 45' from County Road. <br />As already noted above, the applicant has been advised that the existing foundation under the old <br />stmcture cannot support the proposed second story. Applicant shall install an entirely new <br />foundation. Applicant has applied for approval of the existing setback at the side/north lot line at <br />3.5'. Applicant has also placed garage addition at existing detached garage setback of 27' from the <br />side north lot line. <br />Hardcover in the 250-500’ setback area is excessive because setback area is limited. Total hardcovCT <br />is maintained at 16.3%. The 75-250' setback area will contain only 6.1%. Major issue for this <br />review is resolve of the intense setback variances sought by applicant. <br />Hardships <br />The hardships remain the same as in the earlier review. <br />1. <br />1 <br />Triangular or unusual shape of property. <br />Property is surrounded by either roadways or driveways on all sides, <br />3. Property has been assessed and is served by sewer. <br />4.Desire of applicant to balance visual needs of property owner to the north and <br />preserve lake views where applicant has no legal claim as property is not a lakeshore <br />lot. <br />5. Agreement to maintain 15' setback from west lot line.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.