My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-15-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
12-15-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 11:15:44 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 11:12:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iSSlfiQ <br />ration <br />iVhile <br />10 has <br />ithout <br />r <br />Tree Preservation & Reforestation <br />December 10.1997 <br />Page 2 <br />or no trees. These open Helds contribute to importantly to Orono's rural natural <br />character. When these areas are ^'cveloped, even if the development is two-acre <br />residential, this rural natural character can be lost. One method of preserv'ing the <br />natural character is to provide a treed buffer area on the perimeter of the pioperty, <br />particularly where it is adjacent to a public arterial roadway. <br />Development Orientation <br />□ Tree ordinance should be aimed primarily at new development, and have only <br />minimal impact on individual owners of e.xisting developed (and undeveloped?) <br />building lots. There is also strong interest having regulations apply to non-residential <br />development occurring outside the subdivision process. <br />□ The primary responsibility for providing information (tree inventory) must be the <br />developer, but we need to ensure that the financial demands on the developer are <br />reasonable. This might mean we need to limit the extent of those areas required to <br />be inventoried. <br />s tree <br />wing: <br />videly <br />Rural <br />dhods <br />:ertain <br />Enforcement of tree preservation during subdivision development is crucial to <br />success. Will need verv specific guidelines in place as to how tree preservation <br />should occur on developing sites. <br />We need to give developers clear guidelines as to what our goals are and what <br />boundaries they cannot cross, and make them part of the preservation process. It <br />may be helpful to consider tree preservation incentives for developers... <br />We need to beef up our regulations about trees/landscaping for developing <br />commercial sites. <br />1 aren't <br />dsand <br />s prior <br />ids and <br />1 street <br />Orono, <br />nth few <br />Impact on Homeowner <br />□ StatTdoes not have time to monitor cutting of individual trees on every property. If <br />we want this to happen we will need additional staffing (a forester). <br />□ We should provide friendly encouragement and tree preservation guidelines for <br />homeowners, but not regulate them. (How restrictive do you want to be on new home <br />construction on existing vacant lots after the subdivision process is completed?) <br />Standards <br />□ There are many detailed standards to be worked out, and so far not a great deal of <br />agreement as to the specifics. But that's OK; we need to become very clear on what <br />we are trying to accomplish, and then the standards can be written to fit our goals.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.