My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
11-17-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:52:55 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:48:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20,1997 <br />(#7) #2289 JON PENDLETON, 350 NORTH ARM LANE - CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 9:58-10:00 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant had to leave the meeting early due to a conflict scheduling a babysitter on <br />a school night. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Lindquist indicated a survey is required to verify calculations. <br />Schroeder moved, McMillan seconded, to table Application #2289 due to the applicant's <br />absence and lack of survey. Vote: Ayes6, NaysO. <br />(#8) #2290 ELAINE AND STEVE SILUS, 3235 CASCO CIRCLE - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED 10:00-10:23 <br />PJVI. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren distributed information recently received regarding the application. She <br />reported that the application is for a conditional use permit to allow grading within S' of <br />the south lot line. No variances are required. A retaining wall is proposed to be located <br />2' from the property line. Grading will increase the dnveway width to 3' from the <br />property line. If this is not approved, the retaining wall must be located 5’ from the <br />property line. Incorrect aerial photographs were used in determining the grading plans <br />and resulted in the current situation. <br />Van Zomeren said the three-car garage has a severe turning problem; typically, 30' is <br />required. The plan proposes 2^-25' instead of the original 21'. The purpose of the <br />grading is to increase the distance for ingress/egress into the garage. <br />Issues of concern regard drainage, snow removal, car emissions, and problems with cars <br />driving over the proposed wall. Along with the conditional use permit required for <br />grading, the Commission is asked to consider where the wall should be located and how <br />it affects the flow of drainage. <br />The Builder, Bruce Bren, was present. He indicated he was not creating a problem but <br />was attempting to solve a problem. Bren said he was attempting to accomplish what was <br />submitted in the plans to the City while retaining drainage on the Silus property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.