My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
11-17-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:52:55 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:48:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Navarre Housing Stuc'y <br />Respondents were asked if they would move within the next year to live closer to work. <br />The majority of residents indicated that they would not. A very small number indicate <br />they would. <br />Table 1.22 <br />Number Indicating Neighborhood Nuisances Would Cause Them to Move in the Next <br />Ysai <br />Neighborhood Nuisances yes no don't know no response <br />Area I 12 (30%)11 (28%)5(13%)12 (30%) <br />Area II 6 (21%)12 (43%)1 (4%)9 (32%) <br />Area II 1 (8%)7 (54%)n/a 5 (38%) <br />Area IV 11 (27%)18 (44%)5(12%)7(17%) <br />Total 30 (25%)48 (39%)11 (9%)33 (27) <br />Residents were asked if they would move within the next year due to neighborhood <br />nuisances. Most residents w ould not leave because of neighborhood nuisances such as <br />noise and traffic. This coincided with comments made on the survey regarding the level <br />of traffic and noise on County Road 19. <br />Table 1.23 <br />Perception That Navarre Park is in Good Condition <br />Navarre Park is in Good Condition yes no don't know no response <br />Areal 10(25%)8 (20%)21 (53%)1 (3%) <br />Area II 7 (25%)6(21%)15(54 n/a <br />Area II 3 (23%)3 (23%)6 (46%)1 (8%) <br />Area IV 11 (27%)18 (44%)12(29 n/a <br />Total 31 (25%)35 (29%)54 (44%)2 (2%) <br />Residents were asked if they felt Navarre Park is in good condition. Most respondents <br />did not believe that Navarre Park is in good condition. While the greatest proportion did <br />not know what kind of condition the park is in, the exception was Area IV. Those who <br />live closest to the park felt it is not in good condition. In the other areas, the response <br />was split or slightly in agreement that the park is in good condition. <br />Table 1.24 <br />Households Using Navarre Park <br />Household Uses Navarre Park yes no don't know no response <br />Area I 6(15%)31 (78%)1 (3%)2 (5%) <br />Area II 3(11%)23 (82%)2 (7%)n/a <br />Area II 1 (8%)11 (85%)1 (8%)n/a <br />Area IV 11 (27%)28 (68%)1 (2%)1 (2%) <br />Total 21 (17%)93 (76%)5 (4%)3 (2%)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.