My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
10-20-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 11:27:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:25:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
452
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />minutes for JULY 21,1997 <br />(#23 - #2263 Brook Park Realty - Continued) <br />sewermd water rani^ iOT ^ requite confitmaUon and may require some restoration There <br />ul^Scr^r fmatS) in the LR-IC District. A letter is included from the City <br />s:ris"a^— <br />“t“t “ui"o set <br />The applicants were asked to comment. <br />Bill Gleason indicated that they had been unaware of the limitations on the proper^ <br />j* t tr, thp t R District It is their plan to develop affordable housing through higher ty. <br />A "of the development plan is laid out on neighboring property no. 7'' “^tetll'T^l <br />ttiis proposal. He noted there is a driveway currently crossing over wetlands. The wetl <br />be preserved. Entry into the property would be from Livingston Avenue. <br />Gleason said his goal is to provide a lower unit cost through higher density. He pro[»ses a imt <br />would cost about*$135,000 or less if the 48 unit density was allowed. G'«“on Mid *ey woul <br />redo die plan if die 48 uni. plan was not allowed. Each uni. wdl <br />baduooms. a double garage, central air conditioning, and applian«s ^There will be a front entty <br />with garage entry on the other side. There will be four units pet building. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Smith asked if the applicant had reviewed the letter from the City Engineer. Gleason saidjie had <br />no issue with the contents of the letter. He said he thought the driveway may be a probl . <br />Tohn Gleason asked what would be involved with restoration. Gaffron said it would likely <br />include reexcavation and revegetation. Gaffron said the driveway has been a st^dmg i <br />on property being developed and needs to be resolved. He felt it <br />was resolvable. <br />Hawn asked what the cos. figures are for affordable housing, ^ ^ <br />affordable range is a $120,000 valuation, which results m the estimated $135,000 cost per <br />affordable criteria. More density would be required to reduce Ute cost.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.