Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed fence would not exceed 6' or be located within the 75' lakeshore setback. <br />Fences not exceeding 6' in height are considered non-encroachments and are not subject to <br />zoning district setback requirements. There is no defined setback requirement for fences <br />from prop>ert>’ lines. Tlic applicant is proposing locating the north fence for the pasture <br />directly behind the property line. <br />There are no codified setback requirements for pastures from drainage easements, structures <br />or septic systems. The City Septic Inspector has noted a 1 O' setback from the septic system <br />is the advisable guideline. It appears as though the applicant has met this recommended <br />distance. <br />An accessory structure to shelter the animal is not proposed, nor is it required for the <br />seasonal keeping of an animal. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the application based on the findings of the <br />extension educator subject to the fence being located 10' from septic sites and that the manure is <br />composted on site according to best management practices advised by Mr. Geske. <br />Attachments: <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Location Map <br />Topographic Map <br />Permit Record <br />Survey Showing Location of Proposed Pastures <br />Jeremy Geske Letter <br />1^2289 -Jon Pendleton <br />350 Sorth Arm Lane <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />October 20, 1997 <br />Page 3