Laserfiche WebLink
Jj <br />i <br />city of ORONO <br />NltOtMTION Of TNI CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2281 <br />7. VSsh th« proposod biiildinq sit* and th« sits with sxistinq <br />rssidoncs arc siaiiar in arsa to other cowaca - ownership lots which <br />ha\s been approved as building sites since 1984 within the LK-ID <br />soning district as fellowst <br />ll^••estead Vacant <br />m *fi1830 Sailtty* 2720 Pheatbnt Road <br />•lOSl CiesnOf 1475 Cherry Place .88 <br />•1084 Manfield* 4175 North Shore Drive .57 <br />• '«24 laingOf 4180 Forest Lake Drive .40 <br />.84 <br />‘.1(1 * , <br />.,j ./ '7* <br />"I <br />.48 <br />.45 <br />^ f <br />i-- ■ <br />8. ?ho lots were created in the early 50's prior to the City's <br />adoption of ordinances that would have provided standards for the <br />development of lets. <br />5. The applicants have owned the lots Cor cpproxlaately 30 year.. <br />10. Lot I contains no accessory structures and would a^^poar to servo <br />aerexy as additional area receivinq minima 1 inainter.ance. <br />11. Clenn Cook» the City CnginiDcr* in a report dated October 8. 1087 <br />status the followings I <br />Oevelopoent of Lot I on |(elly Avenue will not result in any <br />drainage probleos for edja^nt resident. <br />The run*off from the neighborhood is currently directed ro tho <br />City owned property South of Lot 1. Development of this lot will <br />rcr.uit in ;:dditional run-off to the lake because of an Increase <br />in hardcover. We do not anticipate that this increase in run-ofS <br />will cause any significant adverse effect on the lake. <br />12. Tho City Council has considered this application ir.cludir.q <br />reports i.y City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the <br />proposed variances on the health* safety «*nd viol fare of the comriunity. <br />13. The Ci^y Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property arc peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this zoning district; that granting thw variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions* light* air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve <br />as a convenience to the applicant* but is necessary to alleviate a <br />uemonetrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br />substantial property right of the applicant; and would bo in keeping <br />w!t.^ the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />c>f t K<» City. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />i