Laserfiche WebLink
:ir»_2"iSi2» T:3C_ <br />» » ' • <br />M»« * *>V<i *^.^0 JK9MtK.iC^^ '* ‘ Si '' * ' • •'I —•• %♦“•* <br />[Muns OP TO KB60LMI ORONO COOIICIL MBBTING BBLO OCTOBBR 27, 1966 <br />/%101X/SmE KATAIMBM <br />mr^SBORBLXm DRXVB <br />miKL APPROVAL OP COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN <br />Steve Kateinen was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the plan whi <br />was conceptually approved by the Council on April 1 <br />1986. Applicant has fulfilled all requirements. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the or . <br />outstanding concern was the type of outside lightir <br />proposed. <br />. - ^ r* ,V V • <br />. ‘ ^ Ti :-r#* <br />•- ' ■ A : <br />* • , i $ •* * • «• <br />• - V*. ^ <br />• = • • t ■ <br />Mr. Katainen stated that he proposes a light above co< <br />of the 3 side windows in the portico, 1 coach light c <br />each side of the door and a light above the door, sp< <br />lights on the building facing the parking lot. <br />stated the type of lighting for the sign has not y* <br />been determined. <br />I <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the spot lioht <br />should be directed !to shine down. She stated that r.h <br />feels assured that staff and Mr. Katainen can woi <br />together on the appropriate lighting. <br />It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded I <br />CounciImember Adams, that the Council approve the fin.' <br />and amended commercial site plan and prelimin.i] <br />building plans for Stephen Katainen for a propor.r <br />furniture store on the property located at 3 1< r» <br />Shoreline Drive, subject to staff approving <br />lighting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />#1064 CITY OP ORONO <br />SPATES AVENUE - LIFT STATION <br />CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT <br />City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the in'-: <br />regarding the requirement for conditional use pernit <br />for lift stations, an ordi.iance that has been cn *• <br />books since at least 1968, however the City has nev*^ r <br />previously filed a formal condtionol use perri‘ <br />application for construction of a lift station. When <br />issue was raised this year, staff had two courser, <br />action to recommend to Council: <br />a) obtain an after-the-fact conditional use permit; <br />> t <br />b) request an ordinance amendment to delete <br />requirement never utilized. <br />Staff chose the former as it felt that location revi'-- <br />of such facilities is appropriately a land use iss>;'^.