10-20-1997 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r Zoning File #2294 October 17, 1997 Page 8 of 9 specifically addressed by the applicant to-date is provision of watershed run* IT calculations to confirm the pre- and post-development conditions, which applicant will be providing to the City Engineer. Staff recommends approval of the prof)Osed subdivision subject to the following conditions, manv of which have been noted elsewhere in this memo: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Prior to Council preliminary plat review, applicant shall provide watershed runoff calculations required by the City Engineer to confirm pre- and post- development c.mdilions. Storm sewer and ponding calculations shall likewise be submitted llte proposed impacts to non-Orono protected wetlands delineated by the applicant are subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Stormwater plans and facilities are subject to review and approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and anv other agencies with jurisdiction. Final plat approval . / _________ . . • .1 i W -W --------------------------------------------- 9 ^ by Council shall not occur until MCWD approvals have been granted. Applicant shall provide street design information to the City Engineer and if necessary shall make changes to the vertical and horizontal curves to meet required standards, subject to City Engineer approval. Final saniU’ sewer design plans shall be submitted for City Engineer approval, showing service locations and elevations. The segments of 8" sewer within the right-of- way of Wildhurst Trail and between Lots 3 and 4 shall be directionally bored to minimize impacts to the road or to the steep slopes on the property. Additional grading plan details as required by the City Engineer shall be submitted, including anticipated site grading plans for construction of homes on Lots 1, 4 and 5, in Block 2, which each have an impact to the ravines. Such preliminary grading plan details should show how residence structures can be developed within those lots without impacting the ravine areas. Pending review of such proposals, the City may impose a "no-disturbance" line within said lots adjacent to the subject ravines. Perimeter drainage and utility easements abutting properties outside the plat shall be increased to I O' in width, and interior lot boundaries shall be provided with drainage and utility easements 5 ’ either side of said lines. Although not in keeping with the Park Commission recommendation, staff continues to reconunend that the areas near the no;lherly ravine be dedicated as park land rather than placed within the useable area of Lot 1, Block 2. In staffs opinion, the area between the two branches of the northerly ravine should become part ot the park system. Absent ! J