Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2294 <br />October 17,1997 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />City Engineer Comments <br />The City Engineer reviewed this subdivision at the sketch plan stage, and has submitted <br />additional comments after review' of the current 6-lot proposal. His comments address utilities, <br />streets, grading and drainage, and are attached as Exhibit F, summarized as follows: <br />1.Utilities. The sewer design appears acceptable. A future line to serve the <br />property to the south of Lot 5 appears feasible. Extending the sewer along the <br />west side of Wildhurst Trail will be difficult due to steep slopes along the^^ <br />roadway and may be more appropriate down the center of Wildhurst Trail, ia- <br />2.Streets. Street locations appear acceptable. Horizontal and vertical curve data <br />is needed to verify meeting_rs4uired design speed and radius standards. The <br />easterly cul-de-sac does not appear to meet the centerline radius standard but <br />may be acceptable due to its short length. Final plans to be submitted by <br />applicant should also include a typical street section based on a geo-technical <br />analysis of the site. <br />3.Grading. Additional erosion control measures are needed for sanitary sewer <br />construction on steep slopes. Erosion control measures must be in place prior <br />to site grading, and grading plans for Lots 1, 4 and 5 should be submitted to, <br />determine any impacts to the ravines. <br />4.Drainage. Outlet structure in the stormwater basin should be sized to provide <br />rate^ontrol. Since post-development flow conditions may not exceed pre­ <br />development conditions, applicant must submit drainage area maps and storm <br />sewer and ponding calculations with the final plans. All stormwater plans <br />should be submitted to the DNR and MCWD for review and approval. <br />Conformance with State Environmental Review Regulations <br />Exhibit G is staffs analysis of the LGA Saga Hill projects in relation to the State of Minnesota <br />Environmental Review Regulations administered by the Minnesota Environmental Quality <br />Board. Staffs conclusions are as follows: <br />1.LGA’s northerly project and southerly project are independent of each other and <br />not "phases" of a greater development plan. <br />2.Neither project is in a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) <br />or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) category. <br />iP <br />i <br />I <br />I