Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />To:Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From:Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Date:September 11, 1997 <br />Subject:#2294 LG A Investment Group, 1181 Wildhurst Trail/Garden Lane - Preliminary <br />Subdivision & Street Vacation - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential. Sewered <br />Minimum Lot Area Required: 1.00 acre <br />Minimum Lot Width Required: 140’ <br />Summary of Request <br />Applicants propose a 7 lot subdivision of 8.89 acres primarily located between Wildhurst Trail <br />and undeveloped Garden Lane, also including a parcel west of Garden Lane. This property has <br />been informally known as the ’Sos.,in Property' and also includes the Sollner Lot 90. The <br />application involves the construction of new public roads, vacation of a portion of Garden <br />Lane, and creation of new building sites as well as stormwater facilities and municipal sewer. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Plan Sheets 1-4 Submitted August 29, 1997 <br />Initial Grading Plan Submitted To Meet August 22, 1997 Deadline <br />City Engineer ’s Comments <br />Planning Commission Minutes of May 19, 1997 <br />Staff Memo and Selected Exhibits of May 16, 1997 <br />I. Right-of-Way Vacation <br />Applicant proposes vacation of a 60’ x 325’ segment of undeveloped Garden Lane, replacing <br />it with a 50’ x 400 ’ segment of new public road offset approximately 100’ to the east. Th <br />vacation will allow for two building sites on the west side of the road. (See Exhibit D) <br />Garden Lane was dedicated as right-of-way in the plat of Tonkaview Gardens in 1921. While <br />an old farm road exists within the right-of-way, the City has not opened nor maintained the <br />road. The City has no existing utilities in the portion of Garden Lane to be vacated. Staff has <br />requested confirmation from utility companies as to their current use of the right-of-way and/or <br />the need for easements. No responses have been received as of this writing.