My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:10:36 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:01:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
476
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
**♦ • <br />. . 9. X Jtm'i£t. <br />Zoning File #2293 <br />September 1 1, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br />confirm the ultimate use of the Van Sloun property. If that becomes dedicated open space <br />(either subject to a permanent open space easement or deeded to the City for park purposes) <br />then there may be some justification for the density transfer for 13-14 lots. <br />II. Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />Applicant proposes that the City amend its Comprehensive Plan by expanding the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary, and extending the City's urban ser\'ice area to <br />incorporate the Morgart 10 acre parcel. The basis for this request includes: <br />A. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required in order for this property to be <br />rezoned to urban densities. <br />B. A MUSA amendment is required in order for the sewer to be extended to the <br />property. <br />C. The property is only marginally developable without sewer, and the rezoning would <br />result in a more efficient development with greater opportunities to provide blocks <br />of open space. <br />Applicant has suggested that the City could view this expansion as merely a trade-off in <br />sewer units from the Sollner property to the Morgart property. However, it can be argued <br />that for properties that realistically could have contained 8 sewered lots and 5 unsewered lots, <br />the proposal yields 12 sewered and 2 unsewered. The numbers don’t balance; the issue is not <br />one of sewer capacity but of expanding the MUSA to accommodate new development. <br />Such an expansion is in conflict with a number of goals and policies contained in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, in the overall planning policies: <br />"3. <br />"4. <br />URBANIZATION WILL Nilt BE EXPANDED INTO THE EXISTING <br />RURAL AREAS. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged <br />growth plan and therefore the urban service area will oq I be expanded into the <br />rural service area. Urban serv ices will n^i be expanded into the rural service <br />area." <br />THE EXISTING URBAN SERVICE AREA IS FIXED. Orono's Urban <br />Serv ice Area (MUSA) is fixed by the various elements of the Community <br />Management Plan, and is legally described as shown on Map #6." <br />ADDITIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR ONLY IN THE <br />DESIGNATED URBAN SERVICE AREA. Additional urban de% elopment <br />-4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.