My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
09-15-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 10:10:36 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 10:01:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
476
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I% <br />1/ J Bonestroo <br />Rosene <br />^ |H Anderlik& <br />Associates <br />Engineers & Architects <br />Bonestroo. Roicne. Anderhk and Associates, tnc is an Affirmatiye Action Equal Opportunity Employer <br />Principals Otto G Bonestroo. PE • Joseph C Anderlik. PE • M;^rvm L Sorvala. PE • <br />Richard E Turner. PE • Glenn R Cook. PE • RoOert G Schunicht PE • Jerry A Bourdon. PE • <br />Robert W Rosene PE and Susan M Eberim C PA . Senior Consultants <br />Associate Principals Howard A Sanford. PE • Kcitn A Gordon PE • Robert R Pfcfferie. PE • <br />Richard W Foster. PE • David O Loskota. PE • Robert C Russek. A IA • Mark A Hanson. PE. • <br />Michael T Rautmann. PE • Ted K Field. PE • Kenneth P Anderson. PE • Mark R Rolfs. PE • <br />Sidney P VP'iiliamson, PE . R S • Robert F Kotsmith <br />Offices St PauJ. Rochester. Wiiimar and St Cloud. VN • Milwaukee. Wi <br />June 11.1997 <br />Mr. Michael P. Gaffron <br />Assistant Building and 21oning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Post Office Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />JUM <br />V59T <br />Re; Whitehead Subdivision <br />File No. 139-1619 <br />Dear Mike, <br />We have reviewed the preliminary plat and sketch plan for the proposed Whitehead subdivision. The property <br />is generally located south of the Luce Line, north of Lyman Avenue and east of Smith Avenue in the southwest <br />quarter of Section 35, and the northwest quarter of Section 2. There are several significant issues that need <br />to be addressed relative to engineering matters and included with the plan. <br />1. Streets: Lyman Avenue presently exists as a 12-foot to 15-foot wide paved access from Smith Avenue <br />to approximately 900 feet east. From approximately 900 feet to 1800 feet east of Smith Avenue, Lyman <br />Avenue exists as a 12-foot wide gravel access. There is no existing turnaround or cul-de-sac on Lyman <br />Avenue. Five homes are presently served by the gravel portion and an additional three homes are served <br />by the paved portion of the road. The present access is not acceptable from an engineering standpoint <br />and would limit the ability to provide access for fire and emergency vehicles. <br />If the proposed development is to proceed, we would recommend that the developer be responsible for <br />the upgrade of Lyman Avenue to private street standards, from Smith Avenue to the driveway location <br />of Lot 3. A cul-de-sac should be constructed at this location, requiring that the existing 8-inch culvert <br />be replaced. Widening of Lyman Drive should be to the north of the existing alignment due to trees and <br />existing topography. The access point for Outlot B onto Lyman Avenue has poor site distance and should <br />be reviewed. <br />The City code specifies a maximum length of 1000 feet and ten units on a cul-de-sac. All streets require <br />a 30-MPH design speed and a 275-foot centerline radius. No more than two units may be served from <br />a private driveway. Private streets ser\'ing three to seven units must be paved 24 feet wide, more than <br />seven units require 28 feet. All streets require 50 feet of right-of-way. Due to the existing house <br />locations and topography on the site it would be impossible to meet all of the code requirements. A <br />shorter centerline radius could be mitigated by placing curve ahead warning signs at both ends of the <br />curve. A 20-foot paved surface may be an acceptable access if a variance is granted by the City. Public <br />safety issue will need to be addressed. The fire department should review the plans and provide <br />comments. <br />2.Grading: Constructing the proposed mound systems, houses, and driveways will require nearly complete <br />clearing and grading of the property. Due to the length of the driveway on Outlot B it should be <br />constructed to a 20-foot width to provide access for fire trucks. The grading for this driveway will likely <br />require an 8-foot tall retaining wall. The wall should be designed by a registered engineer. The driveway <br />2335 West Highway 36 > St. Paul, MN 55113 > 612-636-4600 • Fax: 612-636-1311
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.