Laserfiche WebLink
rr V— f7> • - -r r-.'-T'r7--v^--:»;4s . t^ <br />• • <br />past years been increasingly filled in to the point of threatening our abilit>‘ to <br />get boats into the cove and to reach the shoreline of each of the properties <br />adjoining it. This thankful!**’ has been solved for the time beina b\ dredaina <br />done by John Brooks and Conley Brooks Jr. quite recently. But our concern <br />is to provide a mechanism that will guarantee that future owners of Lo^ I .> <br />will not in any way attempt to prevent the owners of adjoining properties <br />firom keeping the w ateivN ay na\ igable in the fiiture, even if it requires <br />removal of some portion of that land, as it is Lot 13 where the sand deposits <br />and the land actually grows into the waterway. <br />Finalh, in the Cit>’ Code book, page 431, Subd. 10 .A, requires (shall <br />include) that all issues identified in the subdivision have been addressed by <br />the subdivider for (9) certification by the zoning administrator. As I sirongK <br />feel that has not been tlie case so far in this series of subdivisions, not on the <br />part of the zoning administrator, but in the actions of your commission and* <br />die Cit> Council. 1 am hopeful that there will be a more careful and detailed <br />consideration of all the issues involved in tins application and those <br />involving all the adjoining properties before a decision is made on an>’ of <br />these subdivision requests or permits of an> kind are issued on the.se <br />properties. <br />Sincerelv. <br />Robert T. Flo' d <br />-S'