Laserfiche WebLink
ti J <br />.*-* • V <br />access is very important to the owners of980 West Femdale, but is immaterial to the owners of <br />905 West Femdale who have an abundant supply of such access. <br />Orono Application No. 2269 had the beneficial net effect of allowing for the removal of <br />the old Sharp house, and combining the land on which it sits (Parcel G) with the McCourtney <br />house (Parcel J) at lOSS West Femdale Road The lot line rearrangement proposed herein is not <br />detrimental to McCourtney. This lot line rearrangement is also not harmful to the Charles Floyd <br />house because it does not have any impact on the Charles Floyd house one way or another. The <br />Charles Floyd house is located entirely easterly of all the lands in question (except Parcel D which <br />partially adjoins the Floyd property). This lot line rearrangement regarding Parcels C and D was <br />specifically agreed to by John Brooks, who purchased the old Bagley (McDowell) site at 90S <br />West Femdale Road in June, 1997 from Conley Brooks, Jr. <br />With regard to hardcover, there is immaterial positive or negative impact on the John <br />Brooks house at 905 West Femdale Road and the Conley Brooks, Jr. house at 980 West Femdale <br />Road, because all of the lands which are the subject of this lot line rearrangement request are <br />within the 0 foot to 75 foot set-back area in which area no hardcover is permitted. Consequently, <br />it does not make any difference for building purposes who owns these little parcels of land. It is a <br />strictly neutral factor Each of 980 West Femdale Road and 905 West Femdale Road has its own <br />hard cover computation and its own hard cover issues based on the fact that so little of each is in <br />the 75 foot to 250 foot zone. <br />In sum, this lot line rearrangement completes the logical rearrangement of properties in <br />this immediate neighborhood after the sale of the Skarp property and after the sale of905 West <br />Femdale Road to John Brooks, with one exception. <br />The exception is a significant one. The exception relates to Conley Brooks, Jr. and <br />Charles Floyd as putative co-owners of the 20 foot parcel carved out of the Skarp property via <br />the 1951 deed. There has been and there continues to be discussion between Conley Brooks, Jr. <br />and Charles Floyd (through Robert Floyd, Charles Floyd’s son, and Kevin DeVore, Robert <br />Floyd’s lawyer) of Brooks’ proposal that Conley Brooks, Jr. and Charles Floyd effectuate a swap <br />whereby Charles Floyd would give up his undivided one-half interest in the 20 foot parcel (Parcel <br />B) in return for the easterly part of Parcel D, just in firont of the Charles Floyd house at 960 West <br />£601:921813 2 <br />-jaaBw,.,