Laserfiche WebLink
#2239 - Sketch Plan <br />May 16, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br />2. <br />3. <br />3. <br />4. <br />plans submitted wth the formal application must include existing and profMDsed 2’ contours. <br />The plans must also include the following; <br />Erosion control. <br />Building pad locations and elevations. <br />- Temporar>‘ erosion control during construction. <br />PesifeTiated Wetlands. There are no designated City or NWI-mapped wetlands within the <br />property. The major ravine and drainageway at the northern portion of the property is <br />not designated on the City ’s wetland inveniory maps. <br />Utilities, This property is within the MUSA and sanitary sewer is available from either <br />Tonkaview Lane or Wildhurst Trail. Water supply will be provided by individual private <br />wells. Referring to Exhibit D. sanitary sewer will have to be extended approximately 300' <br />north along Wildhurst if tliat route is used, which is probable since the sewer in Tonkaview' <br />would likely have to be lowered to serve Lots 2, 5 and 6. The developer will bear the cost <br />of sewer installation in addition to a per unit sewer connection charge ($7,445/unit per 1997 <br />fee schedule) since the property has not been previously assessed for sewer <br />Easements. The proposed road locations eliminate past concerns regarding the steepness of <br />access to Wildhurst which would have required extensive excavation. The drainage and <br />grading plans must address how drainage will be directed, providing storm sewer where <br />necessa’y. <br />In the original Heathercroft plat (of which the Soskin property is existing Lot 2), the subject <br />property was platted with 10' drainage and utility easements along all exterior lot lines. The <br />City w ill ask for a dedication of drainage and utility easements at 5 ’ width along all internal <br />lot lines and 10' along the proposed road right-of-vay. The City will ask for drainage <br />easements over all retention areas, drainageways and storm sewers. <br />Private vs Public Roads. The Orono Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of <br />private roads in the rural area to serve new development. In the urban area (1 acre and 1/2 <br />acre zones) all new roads are generally expected to be public. The City does not generally <br />encourage the development of public road cul-de-sacs due to maintenance requirements, but <br />in this case it is staffs recommendation that both cul-de-sac roads be accepted as public upon <br />completion. The basis for public roads here is two-fold: 1) The development is in a sewered <br />urban area, and the cul-de-sacs are not unusually lengthy; and 2) The City needs to retain <br />public access to the newly acquired park areas along the Garden Lane right-of-way. <br />The new road will also have the potential to serve Lot 70, Tonkaview Gardens, which is <br />directly south of proposed Lot 7. It has not been determined how or whether that paicel <br />would be assessed for the road extension which would serv'e it, or whether sewer would be