Laserfiche WebLink
J. <br />TO:Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM:Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />DATE:August 15, 1997 <br />SUBJECT: #2264 Janet C. Kieman, 1491 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Continuation <br />of Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential. 2 acres, sewer installation in <br />progress. <br />Application: Revised side setback, lake setback, average lakeshore setback, and hardcover <br />variances to construct additions to the existing residence. <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A - Plan A Site Plan and Elevations <br />B - Plan B Site Plan and Elevations <br />C - 1996 Approved Site Plan and Elevations <br />D - Letter from Adjacent Property Owner <br />E - Notice of Planning Commission Action 7/31/97 <br />F - Memo and Exhibits of 7/17/97 <br />Note: This item was tabled at your July meeting pending additional review by the applicant for <br />further review of the foundation and existing structure reuse possibilities. Absent the ability to reuse <br />a substantial portion of the foundation and existing house, applicant would need lot area and width <br />variances for what would be essentiallv new construction. <br />Discussion <br />Applicant has submitted two revised plans, both of which make use of substantial portions of the <br />existing foundation and a number of walls of the existing house. Applicant has also now removed <br />the side and ’ ':e setback encroachments which were not originally approved a year ago. However, <br />after the Jul> meeting, during a meeting with the applicant, staff realized that the currently proposed <br />plan has additional bulk of structure lakeward of the average lakeshore setback as compared to the <br />original proposal which also requires further Planning Commission review. <br />Plan A is the plan for which you reviewed the footprint in June, revised to exclude the cantilevered <br />window that encroached the 75' setback and removing the three season porch which encroached on <br />the 30 ’ side setback. Not brought to your attention in July was the fact that Plan A includes a much <br />higher house than was approved a year ago, with additional bulk of structure encroaching the average <br />setback line.