My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
08-18-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 9:27:35 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 9:20:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 7,1997 <br />(#6 - Tree Preservation - Continued) <br />Wilson acknowledged that the philosophy of preservation is within the ordinance and <br />comprdiensive plan giving more credibility to a tree preservation policy. <br />Van Zomeren noted references to rural areas regarding native vegetation within the 0>7S* <br />shoreland (4.13), land use for future devdopment enhancing the environment and <br />preservation of views (4.1S), rural dendty and open space retaining woodlands and <br />wildlife (4.9). <br />(Wlute arrived at this time.) <br />Beal questioned whether or not the conq>rehenrive plan needs to be revised. Van <br />Zomeren indicated that it will have to be done. She said she was surprised by the amount <br />of references to tree preservation in her review stating that priorities are the same as in the <br />proposed tree preservation policy. The "teeth" for adherence to policies will be through <br />the subdividon ordinances. <br />Van Zomeren reference definition #58 of shade trees. Van Zomeren said species and size <br />should be indicated. Beal sdd subdivision H2 on page 3 refers to it. Van Zomeren <br />referenced the first paragraph in 4.32 where it in^cates the supply b provided by the <br />developer. She noted it could be argued that the tree preservation should make that <br />pro\dsion. White said if the Commissioners had known these policies were in the <br />ordinances and codes, these requirements would have been required. Wilson noted the <br />lack of reference to what is required for fields. Van Zomeren said vegetation plans can be <br />requested. <br />Van Zomeren referenced the general policy statement regarding the removal of trees. She <br />sugg ested tree location could be noted and the possibility of bufifering along the road <br />frontage. She noted that b has probabty been arbitrarily enforced in the past. New trees <br />are to be at least 2 ” in diameter. Van Zomeren noted that the policy has not been used in <br />the past. She indicated that the Jyland Development which b now vacant land and <br />recentty approved does not have to inventory all trees. She noted that thb is similar for <br />Saga Hill. She does not believe tree removal will occur here but there are parcels where it <br />could happen and should be protected.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.