Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2187 <br />July 16,1997 <br />Page 2 <br />neighboring property owner as a result, <br />The proposed plans include no apparent revisions to the envelope of the existing portions of <br />house within the 50' street setback, hence no street setback variance is required. <br />HardshipsA^ariance Justification <br />Planning Commission should review the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 3737. <br />Perhaps the primary justification for granting the side setback variance originally, was the <br />inability to coustruct additions to the north, west, or south sides of the house without <br />significant variances to the street setback or lakeshore setback requirements. >V’hile this <br />property is somewhat substandard in acreage (1.5 acres dry buildable) in the 2 acre zone, the <br />required setbacks leave a buildable envelope of only 1,800 sq. ft. Planning Commission <br />concluded that it w'ould be more appropriate to expand the residence to the east near the side <br />lot line, than to encroach any further into the street setback or lakeshore setback. Since the <br />existing house covers nearly the entire buildable envelope, applicants had no alternative but to <br />expand into a required setback. <br />The difference between the variances approved in 1996 and the current application is simply <br />the additional story above the proposed attached garage/storage addition. Some minor room <br />size and use revisions have occurred, and now the addition will include a bedroom/exercise <br />room above the garage wing. The new second story incorporates a steeper roof system, hence <br />the bulk of the structure may appear significantly greater than that which was originally <br />approved. <br />Planning Commission should consider the standard criteria for determining undue hardship in <br />reviewing this request: <br />- Can the property in question be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls? Yes: The existing residence may be continued as <br />is for its current residential use. <br />- Is tlie plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property and not <br />created by the landowner? The existing house and detached garage were <br />constructed prior to current codes, and the 150' lakeshore setback is a recent code <br />change which has had significant impact on the buildable envelope of this property. <br />While the existing house nearly meets the current setback requirements, any <br />additions outside the existing envelope would encroach on a required setback. <br />- Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the locality? The RR-IB <br />zone 30' side setback is intended to maintain the rural character of the 2 acre zone <br />and to provide open space. The only adjacent home is approximately 80' from