Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />• •• <br />CITYof ORONO <br />AsiiSx <br />aESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />4. <br />A.The existing 604 s.f. deck platform located at the shoreline encroaches <br />into the neighboring propert>' and is proposed to be removed, resultmg m <br />significant decrease in hardcover near the lakeshore. The net decrease m <br />0-75’ hardcover from 14.4% to 12.5% is a positive improvement to the <br />property. <br />* B.Applicant’s dock similarly encroached the neighboring property Ime <br />extLded and is proposed to be moved to meet LMCD <br />thereby creating an access point offset by approximately 30 from the <br />existing concrete stairway which leads down the lakeshore bank an <br />provides access to the shoreline for the applicant. <br />C.Planning Commission fmds taat it is appropriate to allow a 4’ walkway <br />S’™ ‘Si-.. <br />lakeshore bank. <br />D.sSSHsMs <br />The proposed 12" depth of sand between the nprap and the retammg wall <br />has been reviewed by the City Engineer who finds it accepuble tom m <br />engineering standpoint. The majority of the sand ar« “ <br />revegetated wif. native grasses, leavmg approximately a 10 x20 area ot <br />sand exposed to provide a "beach" character. Plannmg Commission finds <br />that leaving patio blocks in place underneath the sand layer may provide <br />additional subili^ for the shoreline and therefore it is appropnate to <br />the patio blocks in place. <br />The City CouncU has considered this application includmg the “ings ^d <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by co^ <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed vanance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 7