Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance wll not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />The variance \%ill not impair health, safety, comfort or morals. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The lot size is existing and cannot be increased to meet the minimum lot size requirement <br />unless more land was acquired from the adjacent owner. <br />Issues <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The lot can meet all of the setback requirements for the zoning district. How ever, <br />it does not meet the minimum lot size requirements. <br />Staff prefers to have the building plans for the new residence to determine the <br />impact on the character of the surrounding property. <br />The zoning lot is adjacent to the Luce Line Trail. Existing vegetation on the <br />property that screens the residential lot from the trail should be preserved. <br />The topography of the zoning lot slopes from Leaf St. to the existing residence <br />approximately 10'. The applicant will have to provide drainage plans for the Building <br />staff. <br />5.The applicant needs to provide a signature from the owner of the property that <br />they have permission to apply for the variance. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />To request that the applicant provide more information regarding the type of residence <br />to be constructed and its proposed location on the lot relative to the Luce Line Trail. <br />Attachments <br />A Application <br />B Plat Map <br />C Topographical Map <br />D Existing Survey <br />E Lot Area Calculation <br />F Permit History <br />U2261 Same Tony’ Etden Co. <br />Address: 345 La Si <br />dateofPC:July2L. 1997 <br />page —4