Laserfiche WebLink
• . *«*• <br />■n T- : - <br />' f V-. V * ‘ <br />• • • <br />'*?tf-;.^SUBjfECT: <br />4*:’-V <br />^ -Ci^ ^istrator <br />* - Administrator <br />..;' >^:V d WE: : ’ V • September <br />' Rivers - 1442 Shoreline Drive <br />Var^ce - Lakeshore Setback ^ Expand Existing Non-Conforming <br />Dtfolling in B-2 Zone <br />%. •%•*«. «..• •• <br />jm'm <br />ai <br />•* '• *..' tr* <br />■•••V .* • »i.v <br />.‘.-•A -a'V;..• <br />•Jf- •>., <br />V^AW <br />:* •>- ^.v* ■*••..,•. > <br />/•H-Mr. vRivers (Wiridward Marine) is considering reaching ah agreement with <br />•. - <br />i>:?^Mr.iMcJ^an idiei^^ he would lease or purdiase Mr. McMahan’s proper^ to the <br />* 'va <br />L*- *. > <br />• <br />■5^ <br />•••••f: ;■" ‘">x <br />■ t t^'4noiyrof include tte/residence Uhind Mac’s <br />■-:4i^tza'Building,v':,• '•:-4:' , - ^ <br />is now only 38’ frora the shoreline (Mr. River’s measure-.|^^>i <br />*'• water level is extremely low this year. ' -.-x <br />V <br />-- y <br />V •' <br />■< <br />•.-•H; ... <br />ival for an addition to‘the house (non-confoiTidng^questing s>pro <br />7’^iesidence in B*2 Zcne). Tne proposed addition would be 414 sq. ft* in area <br />9’ closer to the shoreline. This would result in a 29’ Idceshore <br />.‘i/‘;'aetbadc from the present shoreline. I don’t have the data as to.>diere the <br />^"?^-]^fiioreline would be if Ae water level were at a 929.4 elevation. ’ <br />■ ■ <br />v'f <br />• <br />i . •- <br />fV-*» <br />i-.• <br />iA •• <br />:i <br />^ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ agreed to' ' <br />xiemove the easting hardc^r surface extending to the shoreline between the <br />' Wndwrd MariM huilding and Mac’s Pizta building. This concrete asphalt slab <br />• ;. /;!$'approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in area. Approximately 1,200 sq. ft. of this <br />:/.; slab is located within the 75’ shoreline setback line. If approved, he would <br />• Vv/?'^50 remove the building that previously was used as Mac’s Pizza and more <br />Wcently as a bait shc^. T <br />•_ **in review of..this proposal, we might consider several conditions, boat ^splay. <br />' '• . * along the Coiiaty road and the present sewage disposal system for all buildings. <br />9.^ ' • y i ’ '• *.,4* . . ■ , ' . * *' <br />'^^"Noljait of this^ W lies within the 75’ lakeshore setback, but if this ’ '' <br />'ii/,'sl»'is also .^removed, seepage and filtration would he ^inproved. <br />'•''PLATWING OOM4iSSIQN ^EETING.- October 18, 1976 • V;;. ' ^ <br />• ^ <br />•• <br />/ >.The'Planning Coninission recomnended approval of lot area/widtli/side setback v. : ^ <br />4 cot*KfirV vaTnanrAC ’for* an arlilitAon "to the 6XistinC^ n0n*C0Ilf01Tllin2 h"?:;‘.i' *:-‘ /'•lakeshore setbadc variances for an addition to the existing non-confoiming <br />..._ ...1____________________________________ - ;■•• ■ ••>.•..'.felling subject to the following: <br />sco^rcial ii^.of subject^lot*^o^ side^^except for auto^ilo patkiT^