Laserfiche WebLink
MINUEES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21,1995 <br />/S <br />(#9 - #204^ames & Joann Jundt - Continued) / <br />Mabusth said u\e septic is non-conforming, and h is being questions what affect the <br />apartment would^ve on the septic. Mabusth said it is a good id« to ask for se^c <br />inspections. Peter^n agreed that the goal is not to allow the septic to fiul. Crawford <br />noted that tWs property was considered a hot spot for sewering at one time, and the <br />applicant been de^ng wth this issue throughout all the applications. <br />Schroeder added that Acity cannot allow more people to reside on the pro^ <br />septic can handle. He is id^vor of inspections; and if the system fails, Schroder said that <br />would affect the conditionu^se permit. <br />The property has two separateyptic units, one for the main r^dence and one for the <br />accessory structures. The septi^nits do not meet the separation requirements. <br />Peterson commented that normal i^j^ons ^r every two years. This property, <br />according to Peterson, should be insFwed more often. <br />Schroder moved. Undquist seconded, f^oproval of a studio within ** <br />accessory structure, subject to condition/ofthe CUP with mspeaions of exisung relevant <br />s>stem every two months to show its c/pabilify^m haiidling the increased usage. A charge <br />will be incurred by the appli':ant for ^ra inspcctmn time. <br />Gailfon remarked that the earliest Lt. for sewering pf the property °f,. <br />1996. It is Staffs sense that the s^c is not running out onto ground, but not^ <br />separation is not met. It is posntte that the system my,not he able to hanrUe <br />vLta during this period of to4. If this is found to be true, the septic would need to be <br />pumped out on a regular basa. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />Mabusth commented /n an issue with tree removal in the 0-75' W for waterproofing of <br />a ^el that was not4pproved by Staff. AU of the earth around themnnel was moved <br />drS he waterproofing process. Staffwill ask for replanting of these trees. Crawford <br />commented that to'e elms were deteriorated, and tree roots were mendmg <br />Part of the tunnel encroaches the 0-75' setback. An amended apphcauoit ^ k cormng <br />_before the Plarming-eoiumissionon ----------- <br />risim «2049 FBED GUTTORMSON AND CHIC DWIGHT, 1220 TONKAWA <br />VA mSc ES - PUBUC HEARING - 9:25.9:48 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of PubUcation were noted. <br />\