Laserfiche WebLink
Co^ <br />GITYofORONO <br />lUi^esHO' <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3 611 ^ <br />4. <br />5. <br />E.Replacement of the existing 8' x 24’ deck and relocation of the stairway to the <br />north end of the deck will result in an overall structural hardcover increase <br />of less than 10 s.f. in the 0-75’ zone. Further, structural hardcover on the <br />property can be reduced significantly by removing the 120 s.f. non- <br />conforming deck structure at the Lkeshore. Further, 0-75' hardcover has <br />b'^en reduced by removal of two sheds and a remaining small shed <br />approximately 10-15 s.f. should also be removed from that zone. <br />F.Other hardcover in the 0-75' zone includes a circular gravel driveway, an <br />addition to sidewalk and walls adjacent to ihe house. Applicants have <br />recently removed an 8' gravel driveway leading to the lake which constituted <br />approximately 800 s.f. of hard surface. That is a positive improvement to tlie <br />property, although that area has not been revegetated and should be. Further, <br />the portion of grade-level wood patio extending outside the footprint of the <br />existing deck, i.e. 24 s.f. of wood patio, is unnecessary and should be <br />removed. <br />G.The removal of the detached 120 s.f. deck structure near the lakeshore and <br />concurrent removals of other structural and non-structural hardcover, are an <br />improvement to the property. <br />H.No adequate justification has been presented to support granting a variance <br />for construction of low boulder walls between the house and tlie shoreline. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare <br />of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property in this zor:.;j, district; that granting <br />the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />Page 3 of 7