Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 19, 1997 <br />(#4 - #2182 Herbert Terry Olson - Continued) <br />McNfillan questioned whether cost estimates should be gathered for placement of the <br />garage near the home. Mrs. Olson said it possibly would involve moving the well <br />depending on location and disturbing the landscaping and sidewalk Smith asked if there <br />was an acceptable location where the well would not be affected. Mrs Olson said there <br />was but it would require further excavatioiL <br />McMillan asked if there were other garages located along Bayside Road similar to the <br />applicant's. Van Zomeren said ihCTe were no large garages but some storage structures. <br />McMillan questioned whether this replacement is in keeping with the neighborhood. <br />Sherokee Use, 3613 Eileen Street, said she lives on the back side of the applicant ’s <br />property and has a dock on Bayside. She noted the quaintness of the house in its <br />picturesque setting on the hillside. She felt the garage was tucked into the hill and fit its <br />surroundings. A change would alter the look. She noted a neighbor removed trees to <br />enjoy the lake view. Use said the neighborhood supports the garage replacement and <br />prefers its location. <br />Hawn asked that the City Engineer review the plans for driunage and structural integnty. <br />Hawn said she would have preferred to sec the plans. Schroeder asked Hawn what her <br />concerns were. Hawn sad the cement block has cracked indicating a possible water <br />problem firom the hillside and is concerned with the same problems reoccurring. Mrs. <br />Olson said the problems are due to the age of the garage and settling. <br />Schroeder amended his motion to include City En^eer review of structural and drainage <br />issues. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 2, Stoddard. Smith. Smith noted the proposal presents a <br />difficult decision but felt the applicant had been asked to consider a more desirable <br />location. A location change would not affect the well or lake views. Smith does not feel <br />the proposal is much different than that previously proposed. Stoddard said the hardships <br />are not convincing and no attempt was made to obtain cost estimates for moving the <br />garage 6’ as requested. Mrs. Olson said her husband may have done so but determined the <br />cost was too Wgh. Smith indicated this information would have aided the applicant. <br />Schroeder suggested the information be available for Council review. <br />Van Zomeren noted the application will be presented to Council on June 9 and asked <br />applicant to have requested information submitted by June 1. McMillan asked what would <br />occur if the City Engineer found a problem with drainage or structure. Van Zomeren smd <br />the application would go to the Council with that additional information and possibly may <br />need fiirther Planning Commission review. <br />8 <br />1