Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />! • <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 19,1997 <br />(#14 - #2238 Chic Dwight and Fred Guttormson - Continued) <br />Schroeder was informed that Guttormson has owned the property for three years. <br />Smith questioned the original resolution was not agned and the gravel was not <br />removed. Guttormson said he parks his motor home on the gravel driveway but would <br />have removed H if the enclosure was made permanent. <br />I,ln4ip ri«er asked if the ^licant intends to finish the enclosure and remove the gravel <br />driveway noting the ne^ for a building permit Guttormson said he would if allowed. He <br />would also remove the driveway and reseed to the lakeshore. <br />I itiHgnijU inquired if the lakeshore deck would be removed. Snuth noted h was a <br />condition of the prior resolutioa The applicant stated he did not complete the proposed <br />improvements and would like to maintun the deck. <br />Hawn suggested removal and sodding of the loop portion of the driveway with a back<out <br />area behind the garage. <br />The parking location of the RV was discussed. The applicant sud the garage doors would <br />have to be hd^tened. He would prefer to park the RV in the loop of the driveway. <br />Lindqmst informed Guttormson that the intention is to eliminate hvdcover in the 0-7S* <br />setback. Guttormson said he would store the RV elsewhere during the winter months but <br />park it on the property the two weeks each month that it was not bdng used. <br />Smith inquired of the time frame if the applicant were to remove the driveway to the lake. <br />The applicant said he would request 60 di^s. <br />There were no public conunents. <br />Smith moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2238 subject to Staff <br />recommendation #1, elimination of the loop driveway in the 0-75' setback noting sufiSdent <br />pacing for a turnaround elsewhere, conditions #2 and #3. <br />Guttormson said he would like to remove the proposal for the garage and mdntain the <br />loop drivewt^. Guttormson was informed that he could present that request to the <br />Council. Gafifron indicated the garage request could be r^oved from the application. <br />Smith moved, Schroeder seconded, to eliminate the loop, with conditions 1,2,3, and 4. <br />If the applicant chooses to eliminate condition #4, a permit would be required to <br />reconstruct the garage. <br />The applicant said he wanted to maintain the loop driveway. <br />’ i