My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 8:47:18 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 8:40:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />n <br />:) <br />City of OROIVO <br />CITY <br />OF <br />ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2860_________ <br />A SBSOLDTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCB TO <br />MDNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 « 2 <br />FILE #1574 <br />WHEREAS, James and Sue Ronald (hereinafter "the applicants") <br />are owners of the property located at 2565 Dunwoody Avenue within the <br />City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows; <br />Exhibit A, Attached, (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono <br />for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 <br />& 2 to permit the construction of room additions and a swimming pool, <br />both of which encroach past the defined average lalceshore setback <br />line, and which comprise additional hardcover in the 75-250' zone over <br />and above the normally allowed 25% hardcover in that zone. <br />HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota ; <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #15'^4. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family La)ceshore <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />August 20, 1990 and on a vote of 5 to 0 recommended approval of <br />the proposed variance based upon the following findings; <br />a. The proposed 4' addition to the side is lower in <br />elevation than the neighboring residence on that side, and <br />additionally there is existing vegetative screening such <br />that no existing lalce views enjoyed by the neighboring <br />property owner will be encroached upon. <br />b. Lilcewise, the proposed 2' expansion of the lakeside <br />wall of the house and the raising of a portion of the house <br />in it*s existing footprintr will have no significant impact <br />on neighbors views of the lake. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />"X-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.