My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
06-16-1997 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 8:47:18 AM
Creation date
9/6/2023 8:40:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2245 <br />June 12,1997 <br />Page 3 <br />3. Potential use by utility companies. <br />Summary of Impacts of Proposed Vacation <br />The following represent potential public and private impacts if the proposed vacation is approved: <br />Applicant Freeburg will have more flexibility in any future relocation of the non-conforming1. <br />garage. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Both applicants will gain area within their homestead lots. <br />The City or County may have to expend public funds to purchase the alley property if needed <br />in the fhture for public puiposes. <br />4.Utility and drainage easements will have to be granted over the alley way to protect the <br />interests of the utility companies and the public. The City would not approve construction <br />of a building over a drainage easement. <br />5. No properties will lose any access to public roads or public waters if the alley is vacated. <br />AgencyAJtility Comments <br />As of this writing, none of the utilities has responded other than U.S. West who indicated they dont <br />serve this area (notice was re-sent to GTE). <br />Hennepin Public Works has discussed this briefly with staff but has not responded in writing as of <br />yet. <br />Discussion <br />Since there are a number of public purposes served by this alley way or which may be served m the <br />future by this alley way, staff questions whether it is appropriate to vacate this alley. While it may <br />seem to the property owners that the alley serves no public purpose, the fact that Lot A in <br />combination with the alley has a width of approximately 30-35 ’ within a flat ai^ of a drainage way, <br />suggests that this area may have potential drainage control value to the City in the future. <br />Because this is the inside of a curve on the County Road, there is a potential ^t additional right-of- <br />way could be needed someday in order to straighten that curve. While this is not in any current <br />plans, it may be shortsighted to give up the right-of-way now and then have to buy it back later. <br />t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.