Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOV EMBER 25,1996 <br />(#11- 1997 Non-Union Compensation - Continued) <br />Goetten asked whai the diflerence in percentage would relate to in a dollar figure She <br />was informed the total cost would increase by about $4,000 <br />Jabbour made it clear that it was not necessary to be in the union to be treated fairly. <br />Kelley said he w as in support of the 3% increase. He did ask that the Council and Staff <br />review job values to ensure positions are correctly placed in the pay schedule. Hurr <br />noted her request she has made in the past for review of merit pay and salary stages. <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt P. solution #3808 to approve the 1997 non ­ <br />union pay plan adjustments as follow s A 3®i pay increase, and a mileage rate of <br />$0.3 1/mile vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0 <br />(#12) SAGA HILL PARK ACCESS ALTERNATIV ES <br />Moorse indicated the need to determine short term and long term access for the 9 5 acre <br />tax forfeit parcel and the 13 acre natural area parcel on Saga Hill He presented different <br />alternatives for Council ’s recommendation He noted the use of the Fairview Church <br />parking lot is satisfactory' on a short term basis, but the conditions under which an <br />agreement may be obtained indicate the need for a long term alternative Moorse <br />recommended the proposed long term acce.ss to be that of Garden I.ane w hich now <br />exists, is platted, and allows access to the 13 acre parcel, which, in turn, allows access to <br />the tax forfeit parcel <br />Kelley asked what effect it would have on the top of the ravine. Moorse noted it would <br />run along the edge of the ravine but fell it was doable <br />Goetten questioned the concern of access to all of the parcels Moorse said Garden Lane <br />is platted to serve a number of parcels. He noted that lots 1 and 2 can be served by <br />Garden Lane without affecting the park land. How ever, if Garden Lane is to serve lot <br />#3, Garden Lane would be e.xtcnded along the edge of the ravine creating a separation <br />between the natural ravine and the open space The City, however, has the obligation to <br />provide access to those lots as they are buildable. <br />Kelley suggested replatting the property. Moorse said that was possible with the parcels <br />along the platted right-of-way still having the right to use the access. Kelley noted the <br />replatting could begin past those lots indicated. Moorse stated there would still be a <br />problem with lot #3. It was indicated that lots #4, 5, and 6 could use the access as a <br />driveway if it was replatted. Kelley was concerned that it would result in a 24' wide <br />bituminous roadway These lots have no sewer access Lots 4 and 5 are about 2-1/2 <br />acres in size and lot 6 is larger.