My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
12-09-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 2:14:19 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 2:10:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
387
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIiMlTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 25, 1996 <br />{U\B- County Road 15 Orono Lane to Wayzata Border - Continu -d) <br />Goetten indicated when the plan was originally reviewed, the clear zone was discussed <br />and a variance secured She asked why this was not required here Polaczyk noted there <br />were two types of clear zones, one being rural and one suburban A 20' zone is required <br />in the suburban where berms, curb, and gutter are required In the rural as is the case in <br />this particular area, a 30' dear zone is required The suburban zone is applied elsewhere <br />on this roadway Goetten stated that it had originallv been indicated the trees would be <br />lost due to the wetlands and questioned what the benefit was <br />Kelley asked if the roadway was being moved at this location to the north. Guy Nolan of <br />the design team said it would move 5 meters (about 1 5 ’) from the edge of the bituminous <br />to the other edge Polaczyk indicated this movement would also reduce the impact on <br />the properties on the south side. <br />Goetten said she was disturbed, after having asked for this design several times, to be <br />seeing it for the first time at this meeting Goetten felt it would be imprudent to make a <br />decision without reviewing the actual design Jabbour suggested hearing the information <br />presented and tabling any decision to the next Council meeting. Polaczyk reiterated the <br />movement of the road was due to the recommendation of the geotechnical consultant. <br />Kelley asked if the movement of the road to the north was a result of the poor soils. <br />Polaczyk said this was a partial reason. Kelley asked how deep these materials are <br />located Nolan said the depth is 2 meters on the north to 3-1/2 meters on the south, <br />which is 6 ’ to 10-12' Kelley asked if the materials w ould be excavated Polaczyk said <br />the materials would be floated and then surcharged. Surcharging is adding a fabric <br />material and weighting it down which compresses the soils. Then after a time duration, <br />the surcharge is removed and the road is built to proposed elevations. <br />Nolan indicated the time length for the surcharge to be about 6 months. It would be <br />completed in two stages. Two lanes of traffic would be moved to the south by using the <br />existing shoulder and one lane during the time the north side is being surcharged. This <br />would allow the roadway to remain open <br />Goetten said it was her understanding that the roadway would move 12 ’ to the north. <br />Then the distance changed to 20'. Polaczyk said the amount is now 16'. Nolan explained <br />that the alignment is shifted 10' to the north and the left turn lane shifts it slightly more.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.