11-25-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

B. The proposed improvement will not result in further extensions into the substandard yard areas C. The vacant lot to the immediate rear of property is legally combined with developed homestead parcel to immediate south and will not be developed as a single family residence. D. The property is served with sewer. E. The area and width of this property is consistent with developed lots to the immediate south and southeast of property. F. The property is located immediatei; west of the City's Old Crystal Bay Road park G. The City has received no negative comments from property owners notified of the proposed improvements requiring setback variances. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings and hardships, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 2 and 10.25, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a partial second story over the existing residence and grants a 3' or 30% separation setback variance, a 21' or 42% rear setback Page 2 of 4