My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1996
>
11-25-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 1:55:34 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 1:53:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 <br />ENGINEER REPORT <br />(#9) FEASIBlLm' STUDY AND SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR <br />THE NORTH LONG L4KE SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION #3803 <br />Cook \^as asked to report on the cost of the pioject Cook said the cost was estimated at <br />$1,000,000 for 52 lots This cost reflects a $19,000 per unit cost for assessment, <br />including both trunk costs, and lateral costs The lateral costs include street <br />reconstruction where the pipe is laid, except Dakota Asenue which is being shown as a <br />separate item as a result of the questions at the neighborhood meeting The trunk costs <br />include the four units along Brown Road as part of the system that would hook into it <br />some day in the future <br />Kelley clarified that the four units noted are the four houses on the west side <br />Jabbour asked if the cost was being isolated to determine the cost for a house not <br />originally planned for sewer and located outside of the MUSA line but being requested by <br />the property owner for inclusion Cook said the property owner would pay a trunk <br />charge and a lateral charge in addition to the cost of running a line to the lot and from the <br />lot line to the residence <br />Callahan asked how many units were included and was informed by Cook the number is <br />55, <br />Goetten was given clarification on connection points along CoRd 6. She asked if lot 30 <br />would be served Cook said it would be served from tb.e same line as lot 31. <br />Jabbour voiced concern with the possible connection of the lot on County Road 6 w est of <br />North Brown Road He noted that the lot was not considered as a hot spot The <br />property owuer had indicated that he wanted his additional lot to be considered buildable <br />and the separate lot was now being segregated out Jabbour felt this would result in the <br />property owner being treated diflerently than what was intended as there had been no <br />plans to provide sewer to that property <br />Moorse responded that it would depend on what the Council wants. He noted that the <br />property owner would be charged the trunk and lateral charges and would also be <br />responsible for any additional costs required to enable the sewer to reach the property. <br />At this point, there would be only one unit at about $19,000. Moorse said if it was two <br />units, the cost would be double. Goetten reiterated that the Council informed the <br />property owner, Mr Maresh, that he would have to pay the full cost for the sewer hook <br />up. <br />. 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.