My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
11-12-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 1:46:53 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 1:44:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TIIE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 1996 <br />(#6 - <*2180 Peggy and Frank Pichdman - Continued) <br />Schroeder clarified that the correct notification procedures were followed. Mabusth said <br />the concern was with the lack of notification from the applicants <br />Luann Powell, 2916 Casco Point Road, whose home is next door to the applicant on the <br />north side, said she has lived there for 24 yea'; She reported ha\ing a major concern <br />over looking at a whole new structure (24\24’ garage) on the property In her opinion, it <br />w ould change the uniformity of the cul-de-sac Pow ell said she liked the plans tor the <br />lakeside but found difficulty with the plans for the garage as well as the amount ot <br />hardcover The addition would cause her yard to become shaded resulting in difficulty in <br />growing any vegetation <br />Schroeder inquired what the side setback was for the improvements Mabusth informed <br />him that the side setback is 10’, which meets the requirement <br />Powell said she also is concerned that the improvements would cause poor sight lines for <br />acc-pssibility She added that there is a tuck under garage She also noted that the children <br />currently residing there do not live there year around Powell said she would consider <br />uiving 7' to the applicant for a larger side garage This would allow' he- kitchen not to <br />look out on a major structure Powell also noted there were ’ ■. o mature trees that would <br />be lost under Option 2 <br />Barr>' Glassman. 2914 Casco Point Road, lives two doors away from the applicant He <br />noted, when looking at the contour of the property, the garage and cars would now stick <br />out into the road Glassman said the improvements would obstruct the views ot the <br />Powells He felt the lakeside improvements were all right as the house is tucked into the <br />property at that side <br />Mr Pichelman was asked to remark Pichelman said it was not his intent to oftend <br />anyone. He said they have not lived in the area long and had some crises which caused <br />time to be of essence Pichelman said it was his intent for the plans to tit in with the <br />legalities of the City Pichelman said there was already an 8' line from the end of the <br />garage and 14’ to the bituminous Mrs Pichelman noted that they had considered coming <br />out to the side to lessen any problems for the neighbors, but were concerned with a 3’ side <br />setback The garage to the lakeside has only access to the lakeside and is used tor storage <br />onlv <br />Schroeder noted that the applicant would like to work with the neighbors Mrs. Powell <br />said she would be willing to work with the applicant but did not see how' the <br />improvements could happen <br />Hawn said she was inclined to wait until the neighbors and applicants have spoken before <br />further review as the proposal may change as a result.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.