My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
11-12-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2023 1:46:53 PM
Creation date
9/5/2023 1:44:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 19% <br />(#3 - #2175 Frank and Susan Koubsky - Continued) <br />Mabusth advised that ifthe North Shore Drive access is no longer a problem for <br />applicants that they take time to explore their options before building garage addition at <br />north side of residence <br />Schroeder suggested a time limit of 3 years Koubsky asked for additional time to review <br />the options Stoddard did note that they would have the time between this meeting and <br />the Council meeting to review the plans Koubsky suggested the application be tabled <br />Schroeder moved, Stoddard seconded, to table Application #2175 at the request of the <br />applicant to allow additional time to consider the length of time for the project and to <br />obtain cost estimates Vote Ayes 5, Nays 0 <br />(#4) #2176 DANIEL S. PERKINS, 55 LANDMARK DRIVE - RENEWAL OF <br />ANNUAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 7:05-7:18 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the renewal application proposes for removal of 200 cubic yards of <br />peat material from two w'etland areas on applicant's property. Approval was granted tor <br />the first removal from the smaller of the two ponds in 1995. This application is for the <br />second phase involving 200 cubic yards of peat removal for the winter 1996-1997 season. <br />Mabusth noted that access would not be from either Landmark or Bayside but from the <br />Butterfield's property to the north as in the first application <br />Schroeder read into the minutes a letter submitted by the applicant requesting an <br />amendment to the proposal for shorter periods of time to simplify the procedurp from <br />ever>' year renewal. Mabusth questioned whether this would involve a change in the <br />amount of removal. Perkins said the amount of 200 cubic yards would not be changed as <br />this has been determined to be the amount that is usable in the time period Applicant <br />wishes to amend the current proposal to 200 cubic yards each year for a five year period. <br />Perkins said he would reapply it a change is required. He noted that in the past two years, <br />only one digging took place <br />McMillan inquired how many dump trucks was needed to remove the fill Perkins said <br />two ditTerent sized trucks are used, and the removal is completed in one day. McMillan <br />also inquired if he crosses the Luce Line trail Perkins said that the Luce Line was crossed <br />and Butterfield has property on north side of the Luce Line and is allowed to mine peat on <br />his own property through a permit gained from the DNR. Butterfield has legal access <br />over Luce Line.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.